Money Flows, Chargebacks, and Rails: A Leader’s Guide to 3-D Secure
The rail that powers commerce — with a hidden settlement machine behind the scenes.
Audience: Engineering leaders, fintech architects, payment operations managers
Reading Time: 8 minutes
Prerequisites: Familiarity with card payment flows, Rails applications, and dispute management
Why now: As fraud grows and issuers demand stronger authentication, 3-D Secure is moving from compliance checkbox to profitability lever.
TL;DR:
- 3DS shifts liability for fraud-coded chargebacks from merchant to issuer when successful.
- Chargebacks for non-fraud reasons (delivery, billing, quality) still apply.
- Rails integration is straightforward, but storing 3DS evidence is critical.
- Key metrics: challenge rate, conversion lift, fraud chargeback ratio, dispute win rate.
⚠️ Disclaimer: All scenarios, accounts, names, and data used in examples are not real. They are realistic scenarios provided only for educational and illustrative purposes.
The Baseline: Card Money Flow (No 3DS)
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant C as Customer
participant M as Merchant (Rails)
participant A as Acquirer/PSP
participant N as Card Network
participant I as Issuer Bank
C->>M: Enter card & submit
M->>A: Authorization request
A->>N: Route
N->>I: Forward auth
I-->>N: Approve/Decline
N-->>A: Response
A-->>M: Auth result
M-->>C: Checkout result
Note over M,I: If later disputed for fraud, merchant<br/>bears liability (no 3DS liability shift).
Why it matters: a successful 3DS authentication generally shifts liability for fraud-related chargebacks from merchant to issuer (with some scheme-specific exceptions).
Rails: Integration Posture (Code is Easy; Ownership is Hard)
Here’s the orchestration shape you’ll own in Rails, regardless of PSP:
# app/controllers/payments_controller.rb
class PaymentsController < ApplicationController
def create
payment = Payment.new(payment_params)
# 1) Initiate 3DS
three_ds = ThreeDSService.initiate(payment)
if three_ds.challenge_required?
# 2) Redirect/present issuer challenge (3DS2)
redirect_to three_ds.challenge_url and return
end
# 3) Authorize with 3DS proof attached
auth = PaymentGateway.authorize(
payment,
three_ds: {
eci: three_ds.eci,
cavv: three_ds.cavv,
ds_transaction_id: three_ds.ds_transaction_id,
version: three_ds.version
}
)
render json: { status: auth.status }
end
end
What actually protects you isn’t the controller—it’s the evidence you persist:
eci,cavv/aav,ds_transaction_id,three_ds_version- Timestamps + correlation IDs between 3DS auth and payment auth
- Device and IP risk signals for observability
Yes, Chargebacks Can Still Happen After Successful 3DS
Key reality: 3DS authenticates the cardholder. It shifts liability for fraud-coded disputes when successful. It does not fix disputes like delivery, quality, billing errors, or misrepresentation.
Why 3DS Doesn’t Prevent All Chargebacks
- Fraudulent authentication still happens: fraudsters may occasionally bypass 3DS.
- Non-fraud reasons remain: delivery issues, product dissatisfaction, billing errors, or misrepresentation are still valid disputes.
Examples:
- Customer claims product not delivered.
- Customer dissatisfied with quality.
- Duplicate or incorrect billing.
- Misrepresented item.
What to Do If You Receive a Chargeback on a 3DS Transaction
graph TD
A([Dispute received]) --> B{Reason code = Fraud?}
B -->|Yes| C{3DS successful & evidence on file?}
C -->|Yes| D[Invoke liability shift - submit ECI/CAVV/DS txn id]
C -->|No| E[Defend as standard fraud - limited coverage]
B -->|No| F[Non-fraud dispute - delivery/quality/billing]
F --> G[Defend with other evidence - PoD, comms, refund policy]
D --> H([Outcome: issuer bears fraud liability])
E --> H
G --> I([Outcome: merchant must defend on merits])
Key takeaway: 3DS is a powerful fraud liability shield, but not a complete solution. You must still manage non-fraud disputes with operational processes and provide 3DS proof for fraud-related ones.
As engineering leaders, our role is to ensure payments systems are not only functional but also financially defensive. 3DS is more than compliance—it’s a lever to protect margin, shift liability, and earn issuer trust.
Done well, it doesn’t just prevent fraud losses—it reshapes money flows in your favor.
Metrics That Matter
- Challenge rate / frictionless rate: how often 3DS is triggered.
- Conversion post-3DS: does friction hurt revenue?
- Authorization lift: issuers approve authenticated traffic more readily.
- Chargeback ratio: fraud vs. non-fraud, before and after 3DS.
- Win rate: % of disputes successfully defended with 3DS evidence.
Acronyms & Terms
- 3DS / 3-D Secure: Authentication protocol to verify cardholder identity.
- PSP (Payment Service Provider): Processor that routes transactions (e.g., Stripe, Adyen).
- ACS (Access Control Server): Issuer’s 3DS server that challenges the customer.
- DS (Directory Server): Card scheme’s directory service that routes 3DS requests.
- ECI (Electronic Commerce Indicator): Code showing how transaction was authenticated.
- CAVV / AAV (Cardholder Authentication Verification Value): Cryptographic proof of successful 3DS authentication.
- DS Transaction ID: Unique identifier for the 3DS transaction.
- Chargeback: Dispute raised by cardholder through their issuer.
- Frictionless flow: 3DS approves without customer challenge (risk-based).
- Challenge flow: Customer must enter OTP, biometric, or app approval.
References
- Adyen – Why did I receive a chargeback on a 3DS transaction?
- Stripe Docs – Authenticate with 3D Secure
- Stripe Guide – 3DS2 and Liability Shift
- ChargebackStop – Can You Chargeback-Proof with 3DS?
- Visa Developer – Approval rates and low friction 3DS programs
- Chargebacks911 – Chargebacks in the 3DS era
Comments & Discussion
Share your thoughts, ask questions, or start a discussion about this article.